There’s been a lot of discussion about Hell this week, especially from this apologist, David, so it might be timely to re-post this reassuring little number from 2013: Heaven is hotter than Hell.
It’s just one of those oddities that causes your brain to do little summersaults. Heaven is hotter than Hell. It sounds comical, certainly counterintuitive, but the math just doesn’t lie. Heaven, according to Isaiah 30:26, is where “the light of the moon shall be as the light of the sun and the light of the sun shall be sevenfold as the light of seven days.” Taken as read, Heaven receives from the moon as much radiation as the earth does from the sun, and in addition 49 times more, meaning fifty times in all. Using the Stefan-Boltzmann fourth power law for radiation [(H/E)4 = 50 where E is the absolute temperature of the earth 300°K (273+27)] gives the temperature of H (Heaven) as 525°C. Hell, according to Revelations 21:8 is where the “fearful and unbelieving shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone.” Now here’s the fun part. A lake of molten brimstone (sulfur) means that its temperature must be at or below its boiling point, 444.6°C. Above that point and it’d be a vapor, not a lake. Heaven (525°C) is therefore hotter than Hell (<444.6°C).
It’s the cognitive equivalent of injecting warm chocolate directly into the hypothalamus, and since being published in Applied Optics (August, 1972) has become a favourite of godless (baby-eating) heathen’s eager, as always, to annoy bombastic biblical literalists. What isn’t as well known is that seven years later a convoluted rebuttal was published in the Journal of Irreproducible Results by a rather head-strong Dr. Tim Healey; a man determined to do whatever it took to re-establish the standard arrangement of these post-obituary destinations. His argument, and I’ll lighten the load here, stemmed from errors he saw in the calculation of Hells pressure; errors he stressed which would increase the boiling point of sulfur. Now, most don’t know it but Hell has a GPS location: 31°46′49″N 35°14′24″E / 31.78028°N 35.24000°E, otherwise known as the Jehoshaphat valley; a 7,000,000m2 Iron Age sacrificial pit-come-refuse-dump where sulfurous smelling fires were maintained around the clock to consume it. “Have we any data as to the pressure likely to be found in Hell?” asked Healey in 1979. “The answer is Yes. A 19th century mathematician [Neiht] has already provided the groundwork for us and we may feel confident that by the year 2000 the total number of the damned will be at least 29,422,641,251,519,917,000 souls.” There is a method to this glorious madness which can be perused here, but for our purposes let’s just say Healey went to great lengths to look at the Ideal Gas Equation and how it applied to the finite volume of the Jehoshaphat valley (Gehinnon), the gaseous component of the human body, the dynamics of electromagnetic repulsion, the proposed arrangement of souls in Hell (no more than two layers otherwise those in the middle layers would escape Hells full rigours), and ultimately how it all shifted the phase diagram of sulphur. And here’s his final calculations:
So that, the volume available in Gehenna is 60 x 106 x 2m2 and the original volume of the damned is 0.06 x 29.422641 x 1018m3, then, at constant temperature (which we assume, taking equilibrium) P1V1 = P2V2 or P2 = P1V1/V2 substituting (1) P2 [29 x 6 x 1016] / [2 x 6 x 107] = 14.5 x 109 atmospheres.
Now let us see what pressure is needed to liquefy sulphur vapour at 525°C. We have, using the Clausius-Cleypeyron equation in its integrated form, Log P = 7.43268 – 3268.2/T where P = Pressure in mm Hg and T = the elevated boiling point in °K, so that Log P = 7.43287 – 93268.2/798) = 3.3373813, whence, (2) P = 2174.607 mm Hg = 2.86 atmospheres. (1) is so much greater than (2) that Revelations 21:8 indicates a temperature very considerably higher than 525°C. Thus, Hell is hotter than Heaven.
Now thankfully for me and every other mathematically challenged individual on the planet this labyrinthine mess amounts to absolutely nothing as both calculations are, I’m happy to say, categorically wrong. Heaven and Hell have the same calefaction: 37°C… the temperature of the human brain where both mythological destinations are birthed, lived, and will ultimately cease to exist when the thermometer inside said gullible brain falls to room temperature.
Yeah, yeah either way, the temperature doesn’t bother me. What’s a few tens of degrees between friends and enemies. I’m more interested in who I’m spending my eternity with. And I sure don’t want it to be with [insert all the obvious ones] whereas I’m happy to be with the evil sinners in an eighty degrees less eternity. Please tell noisy Ark to keep that loud guitar down though.
LikeLiked by 1 person
You mean, something like this:
LikeLike
There was a good early C20 work on that subject. Stuffed if I can remember who it was. Or to put it differently I suppose Groucho Marx nailed it too.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Stephen Fry said something along those lines too, when, if I remember correctly, on a Mormon guided tour around Salt Lake City
LikeLike
How is it that Atheists are cooler people, but Christians captivate the public and government? 😦
LikeLike
🙂 In America they seem to do, but isn’t it more the case that politicians (in the US, especially) are just spineless poll-watching automatons?
LikeLike
I think you are on to something…. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’ll be waiting for you 😀
LikeLike
Lounge bar?
LikeLike
A very hot lounge bar.
LikeLike
All the better to enjoy the cocktails
LikeLike
I should hope so too. And I would like an extremely cold San Miguel, por favor, cariño.
LikeLiked by 1 person
But, Mr. Zande, you fall into the same fundamentalist error as fundamentalist believers – taking everything literally. (Translation: you are taking away our fudge capability.)
LikeLike
🙂 But that is what’s written.
LikeLike
Excellent post. I likes it. 🙂
LikeLike
I suspected you might
LikeLike
This was too much math the first time round. My ability to absorb such stuff has not improved one iota in the interim. 🙂
LikeLike
Mine either, but fortunately it doesn’t matter.
LikeLike
Yes, the final paragraph I understood perfectly. I am busy trying to take the thermometer out of my ear just to double check.
Did you notice the posts have gone?
LikeLiked by 1 person
I did! I posted a comment on that last number, and I think that might have inspired the cull.
LikeLike
He had mentioned he was going to take it down, but I didn’t expect it to go so soon.
He did an entire post dedicated to slating me as a troll. I felt quite honoured! He must have spent ages collating all that nonsense.
Quite the fanatic and an innerantist as well, like his new buddy James.
They are something else these people. He reminds of Citizen Tom.
I wonder what he councils about?
LikeLike
Insanitybytes did a post on me then wouldn’t let me comment. How’s that for insane 🙂
I’d imagine he counsels those who’re straying. I hope he has nothing to do with actual “study,” because that type of jaundice perspective on reality is not healthy.
LikeLiked by 1 person
That’s happened to me on at least half a dozen sites where some portion of a comment I have made has been used as a springboard for a response post… only to then moderate and/or ban me from having any further commentary! That tactic demonstrates the lack of intellectual integrity by poster. And IB22 is a case in point: she doesn’t know how to respect those who disagree with her about her religious beliefs and she doesn’t know how to take responsibility for that lack she exhibits.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It’s becoming common practice. Did you see Jame’s latest? He won’t allow comments, either. It’s worth a read, though:
https://thei535project.wordpress.com/2015/07/12/4-reasons-i-dont-believe-in-evolution/comment-page-1/#comment-12371
LikeLike
James has already banned me because he can’t be bothered to defend the shit he writes. And that is what it is: shit.
This latest piece of shit demonstrates once again his intellectual incapacity to be honest… even with himself. He actually believes this shit is strong enough to overthrow the most profoundly insightful and productive model ever devised: evolution. James thinks this shit does the job while conveniently ignoring the fact that the evolution model produces applications, therapies, and technologies that work for everyone everywhere all the time and advances human knowledge with new and productive fields of inquiry. James doesn’t care about any of that; he’s got his shit to shovel. The inconvenience this working model we call evolution causes to him is dismissed by James with tired retreads of creationist tropes… not realizing that all his work is still before him to explain how life changes over time. Expecting reality to have some sway over his opinions is misguided because his brain simply doesn’t work when it comes to criticisms of his religious necessities. And POOFism by Oogity Boogity is a necessity for him, poor little guy. So I miss neither his arrogance nor his ignorance, both of which are essential ingredients for his shit. And he’s welcome to continue to think he can feast on his own colon and benefit by it.
LikeLiked by 2 people
You say this so beautifully, Tildeb. In fact, I have one of your comments saved which I refer to in such debates. It begins like this: “If by ‘theory’ you are referring to what is called the modern synthesis, then there is no debate in the scientific community. None whatsoever. The only debate is foisted by creationists…”
LikeLike
Just to clarify a matter on the post from James on Evolution. He had originally enabled comments and I saw a detailed response from one commentator that point be point dismantled his arguments. I was very impressed! The next day I went back to have another look at the comment and lo and behold it had disappeared.
I concluded as a result that James was actually not interested in truth. If he really was interested in truth he would have left up the contrary opinion and shown why it was ‘the Devil’s lies’. I find the approach of deleting inconvenient comments to be so disappointing, so much so that it causes me to doubt everything he says. Much like an infamous convoluted commentator and active moderator on another blog.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, James (and many others) simply delete those comments which prove their worldview wrong. And it is disappointing. They are admitting that they have no interest in reality. The really frustrating part about it all, though, is they will repeat the information they “know” is wrong next week. Sometimes I wonder how these people sleep at night, when they’re alone with their own thoughts.
LikeLike
As always, John, this is an awesome take on things. I’m savoring your book, and I like the absurd Universe. One thing I find sad while reading it is that it makes better argument than the classical apologetics for Christianity.
I think it adds more sweetness to the mockery.
LikeLike
The universe absurd, yes. I enjoyed writing that part. Actually, it was one of the main teleological questions I was going to ask theists, WHY SO BIG?, but so far haven’t had much opportunity.
Be keen to hear your thoughts when you’re done.
LikeLiked by 1 person
One of the short thoughts I had was from a discussion I had with a different blogger about belief that a deity created the entire Universe.
If that is true, and this deity created it in such a fashion that it would look different than it actually is (like billions of years older, etc.), then it requires that this deity is a liar.
I haven’t harped on this point much, but it’s always been something I’ve been meaning to get around to.
In a similar vein, I also realized I hadn’t apologized to you for my involvement in David’s debacle. I do apologize for any perceived legitimacy I gave to his efforts to do whatever he was trying to do to you and Ark. I’m still not fully understanding why he’d do such a thing.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Nothing to apologise for, SB. It was worth moving the discussion along.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Well pictures of heaven (sorry it’s hard to type that out without laughing) always seem to show a lot of white about so heaven would appear to have a high albedo. So the surface temperature might not be too bad if the surface albedo is like 90% as opposed to the 30% right now. The problem with all that radiation is skin burn/cancer and blindness. Perhaps some very dark shades and some all over white clothing will help. At best, it seems like most people in heaven look like Saudia Arabians. lol
LikeLiked by 1 person
So, the message is, when going to Heaven don’t forget to Slip, Slop, Slap 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
LikeLike
Showing your (our) age. Seek and slide apparently now too.
LikeLike
🙂
LikeLike
And then there’s this supposed answer given by a chem student on the bonus question:
Bonus Question: Is Hell exothermic (gives off heat) or endothermic (absorbs heat)?
Most of the students wrote proofs of their beliefs using Boyle’s Law (gas cools when it expands and heats when it is compressed) or some variant.
One student, however, wrote the following:
First, we need to know how the mass of Hell is changing in time. So we need to know the rate at which souls are moving into Hell and the rate at which they are leaving. I think that we can safely assume that once a soul gets to Hell, it will not leave. Therefore, no souls are leaving.
As for how many souls are entering Hell, let’s look at the different religions that exist in the world today. Most of these religions state that if you are not a member of their religion, you will go to Hell. Since there is more than one of these religions and since people do not belong to more than one religion, we can project that all souls go to Hell.
With birth and death rates as they are, we can expect the number of souls in Hell to increase exponentially. Now, we look at the rate of change of the volume in Hell because Boyle’s Law states that in order for the temperature and pressure in Hell to stay the same, the volume of Hell has to expand proportionately as souls are added.
This gives two possibilities:
1. If Hell is expanding at a slower rate than the rate at which souls enter Hell, then the temperature and pressure in Hell will increase until all Hell breaks loose.
2. If Hell is expanding at a rate faster than the increase of souls in Hell, then the temperature and pressure will drop until Hell freezes over.
So which is it?
If we accept the postulate given to me by Teresa during my Freshman year that, “it will be a cold day in Hell before I go out with you”, and take into account the fact that I went out with her last night, then number 2 must be true, and thus I am sure that Hell is exothermic and has already frozen over.
The corollary of this theory is that since Hell has frozen over, it follows that it is not accepting any more souls and is therefore extinct . . . leaving only Heaven, thereby proving the existence of a divine being, which explains why last night Teresa kept shouting “Oh, my God!”
LikeLiked by 1 person
This is superb!
LikeLike
The atheists always looks foolish when he subjects the great literature of antiquity to his lost-somewhere-in-time, post modern values.
The correct way to interpret the literature of antiquity is to learn the values and world view of the people who inhabited that time period.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Cheers SOM, but how does one factor ignorance into an equation? 😉
LikeLike
John,
Since ignorance is the realm of the atheist, you’ll have to figure that one out for yourself.
LikeLike
Fair enough 🙂
LikeLike
LikeLiked by 2 people
Neuron,
OOOOO! NEEEETOE!!
Allow me to pilfer a quote from the King, Elvis Presley:
“Thank you. Thank you very much.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
My pleasure, Sir Poe.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Let’s see, SOM is wrong again. Please do show that all atheists have “post-modern values”. Do also show what “post-modern values” are. Or are you just making vague claims again, SOM?
it is indeed useful to interpret literature of antiquity by knowing the values and world view of the people who wrote it. This does do quite a job of showing that your bible is not from some god but from just regular old humans. Now, we do know that the literature of antiquity does reflect that many of those humans accepted that slavery was fine, that other gods existed, and that magic worked. I am quite happy that humans have advanced beyond such nonsense. The values of those authors of antiquity are often nothing to be proud of.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Club,
To be an atheist means believing in the ridiculous notion that everything just happened all by itself.
Consequently, it takes a special kind of crippled intellect to be an atheist.
And that crippled, atheist intellect is simply incapable of taking the atheist outside the confines of his own little mind.
That’s why you folks can never understand the true meaning of modern science, or how others besides yourselves actually think and feel.
So in lieu of reality, the atheist hallucinates.
You all do it because that is the nature of atheism.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ah, so you can’t show that all atheists have “postmodern” beliefs nor can you explain what those are. Congratulations, for again demonstrating that you just flail about making baseless claims, SOM.
So, how is that you believe that your god happened by itself, if that’s such a silly thing to believe?
Nice to see more attempts at being insulting with more baseless claims. Please do show that disbelieving in a baseless claim is evidence of a “crippled intellect”. For if it is, SOM, then your intellect is quite sad since it doubts all of the gods that other people believe in.
Please do tell us the meaning of “modern science”. I may not know exactly how you think and feel, but I certainly am familiar with how Christians think and feel, having been one. Of course, any other theist can claim that you have no idea on how others think and feel and make the same claim as you that this is somehow evidence for their god.
Again, poor SOM. Please do show how atheists hallucinates. Where is this evidence of your god, SOM? Surely, if it is so obvious, you can point to it, right? You wouldn’t have to rely on the exact same claims as other theists do, would you?
LikeLike
highly entertaining post, John. Reading “TOOAIN” and it’s wonderful, even just for the erudite writing. Long sentences with lots of clauses, oh be still my heart 🙂
LikeLike
Brilliant! I was mimicking the likes of Paley and his fellow champions of natural theology. Their thoughts might have been wildly askew, but they sure knew how to string a sentence together 🙂
LikeLike
Oh, Club, I just saw this post and couldn’t help but think of you
https://thei535project.wordpress.com/2015/07/12/4-reasons-i-dont-believe-in-evolution/
LikeLike
oh my. Amazing how Christians must depend on lying.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It is, isn’t it? I had to chase my eyebrows around the room after they flew off after reading #1 🙂
LikeLike
Being bored, I decided to answer this TrueChristian and his willful ignorance and intentional lies. We’ll see if they will allow the post to show. 🙂
that a hilarious mental image. I can just see a pair of eyebrows perched on a curtain rod 😀
LikeLiked by 1 person
Unfortunately, James has said he’s not interested in critiques. I posted one, too, but he’ll never allow it. The bubble of lies must be maintained at all cost 😦
LikeLike
well, my post was up and now it’s under moderation. Tsk. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
I just read your post on my email. Nice! And yes, James will never allow that to see the light of day 🙂
LikeLike
OMG!!! Really, you can’t write satire that good, AND, that post isn’t satire. Wow. “There are no transitional fossils, thus evolution is wrong.” Jeebus!! Here’s a great quote I just made up: “There are no creationists with frontal lobes, thus the bible is false.” Dean Martin, Atlantic City, New Jersey, August 22nd 1972
LikeLiked by 1 person
It takes a special kind of nonsense to pen something like that.
LikeLike
“The only sense a fundamentalist Christian makes is none.” Burt Reynolds to Sally Field, circa 1979
LikeLiked by 1 person
“OMG!!! Really, you can’t write satire that good”
Isn’t that the truth.
“Here’s a great quote I just made up: “There are no creationists with frontal lobes, thus the bible is false.”
Hahahahaha
James: “What are frontal lobes?”
LikeLiked by 1 person
John: “They’re the part of the fish ya cut out and toss away, ya dag, blame idjit!”
LikeLiked by 2 people
That post is a perfect example of Idiocracy.
“Narrator: As the 21st century began, human evolution was at a turning point. Natural selection, the process by which the strongest, the smartest, the fastest, reproduced in greater numbers than the rest, a process which had once favored the noblest traits of man, now began to favor different traits. Most science fiction of the day predicted a future that was more civilized and more intelligent. But as time went on, things seemed to be heading in the opposite direction. A dumbing down.
How did this happen? Evolution does not necessarily reward intelligence. With no natural predators to thin the herd, it began to simply reward those who reproduced the most, and left the intelligent to become an endangered species.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
Indeed.
LikeLike
Can you paint that math. I can only read in paintings
LikeLike
Let me get back to you on that one…
LikeLike
Please, I will be glad
LikeLiked by 1 person
Truly an inspirational movie and a harbinger of things to come!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Love it. Made me giggle.
LikeLike
LOL — John, would you please change that to “love”. 😀
LikeLike
For you, anything 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
❤
LikeLike
The Spouse wants me to take her to town so I don’t have time to read through all the comments, just hope that I’m not repeating some other researcher’s research:
“Dr. Schambaugh, of the University of Oklahoma School of Chemical Engineering, Final Exam question for May of 1997. Dr. Schambaugh is known for asking questions such as, “why do airplanes fly?” on his final exams. His one and only final exam question in May 1997 for his Momentum, Heat and Mass Transfer II class was: “Is hell exothermic or endothermic? Support your answer with proof.”
Most of the students wrote proofs of their beliefs using Boyle’s Law or some variant. One student, however, wrote the following:
“First, We postulate that if souls exist, then they must have some mass. If they do, then a mole of souls can also have a mass. So, at what rate are souls moving into hell and at what rate are souls leaving? I think we can safely assume that once a soul gets to hell, it will not leave.
Therefore, no souls are leaving. As for souls entering hell, let’s look at the different religions that exist in the world today. Some of these religions state that if you are not a member of their religion, then you will go to hell. Since there are more than one of these religions and people do not belong to more than one religion, we can project that all people and souls go to hell. With birth and death rates as they are, we can expect the number of souls in hell to increase exponentially.
Now, we look at the rate of change in volume in hell. Boyle’s Law states that in order for the temperature and pressure in hell to stay the same, the ratio of the mass of souls and volume needs to stay constant. Two options exist:
If hell is expanding at a slower rate than the rate at which souls enter hell, then the temperature and pressure in hell will increase until all hell breaks loose.
If hell is expanding at a rate faster than the increase of souls in hell, then the temperature and pressure will drop until hell freezes over.
So which is it? If we accept the quote given to me by Theresa Manyan during Freshman year, “that it will be a cold night in hell before I sleep with you” and take into account the fact that I still have NOT succeeded in having sexual relations with her, then Option 2 cannot be true…Thus, hell is exothermic.”
The student, Tim Graham, got the only A.
FROM: http://www.pinetree.net/humor/thermodynamics.html
I hope this is germane to the issue and adds some enlightenment to all you hell-bound hideous hairy-oaf heathens. Certainly it explained a lot to me …
LikeLiked by 1 person
Brilliant, indeed. Tildeb posted that above, but as far as I’m concerned, it can be posted a thousand times and still be hilarious 🙂
LikeLike
LOL!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Math 🙂
LikeLike
When one walks through The Pearly Gates they’re actually walking through a very high SPF spray-booth.
Plus, they get protective under-raiment.
Can you factor that in?
LikeLiked by 1 person
I can, but sounds awfully like Mormonism 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
A classic!
LikeLiked by 1 person
For Sacrilegious Sunday, yep 🙂
LikeLike
Very funny: applying logic and science to theology. Whatever will they think of next? It’s a bit like asking Father Christmas for a particle excelerator in your stocking.
LikeLike
Santa has those??
LikeLike
Ah John. I don’t want your little face all puckered on Christmas morning. Ask for something else.
LikeLike
An atomising ray gun?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, I’m sure Santa has a surfeit of those.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Phew 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Love this especially the last paragraph. 🙂
LikeLike
Thanks, Sally
LikeLike
I shall distribute this to my heathen friends John; many thanks for the amusement break. XD
LikeLiked by 1 person
My great pleasure, my learned friend 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
The sad thing is I remember reading that article when it came out (I was in grad school). The effect on the religious has been nil, d’ya think it was because of the, you know … math?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Nah, couldn’t possibly be 😉
LikeLike
Reblogged this on Atheist Catalyst and commented:
Proof Christianity is a farce.
LikeLike
You silly atheist. Heaven has powerful air conditioning to cool things down, whereas Hell has a blast furnace to heat things up.
Besides, spiritual bodies (which are non-physical by definition) remain unaffected by kinetic energy.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ahah! So a lake of fire is meaningless anyway. Nice one!
LikeLike
Perhaps Hell is so hot because the AC in Heaven dumps its heat there? How efficient!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Agreed! Yet another example of intelligent design.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’ll take bonfires over sunburns any day. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
True, far more homely 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Pingback: The Lie About Creation | Amusing Nonsense